Does Banning Sex Offenders From Using Social Media Really Do Anything?

sex offenders

sex offenders

Current statistics show that in 82% of online sex crimes against minors, the offender used the victim’s social networking site to gain information about the victim’s likes and dislikes according to the organization Internet Safety 101. The cyber world is a place where sexual predators can assume virtually any identity they wish, and slowly build trust with their victims over time, only to use that sensitive information to take advantage of them later.

Currently, all convicted sex offenders must register themselves in their state’s sex offender database, in order to make their identities and whereabouts public knowledge. Most states also have sex offender residency restrictions which typically include laws that exclude sex offenders from living in certain areas. While there is certainly a fair amount of legislation which limits the physical whereabouts of sex offenders, regulating their online presence has presented some bigger challenges for authorities.

As of right now, Facebook maintains a policy that convicted sex offenders are not allowed to sign up for an account. According to Facebook’s section on law enforcement and third party matters, their official position is as follows, “Convicted sex offenders are prohibited from using Facebook. Once we are able to verify a user’s status as a sex offender, we immediately disable their account and remove their account and all information associated with it.”

Facebook even encourages users to report convicted sex offenders in the following ways:

  • Link to a listing in a national sex offender registry
  • Link to an online news article
  • Link to a court document
  • Documentation verifying the report attached to the sex offender report form

Is It Legal?

However, the constitutionality of state laws banning sex offenders from social media has been under fire recently. Just a few weeks ago, the 7th U.S. Circuit of Appeals in Chicago overturned a federal judge’s decision to uphold an Indiana law, which banned sex offenders from Facebook saying the state was justified in trying to protect children but that the “blanket ban” went too far by restricting free speech.

Clearly this is a tricky, touchy issue. According to a blog article by background check company Instant Checkmate, Texas is trying to pass a similar bill through the house. The article states that, “Texas House Bill 23 is being bottom lined by state representative Trey Martinez Fischer, D-San Antonio. The new law would require convicted sex offenders to reveal their sex offender status, as well as force them to list their crimes and personal information on their social media profiles.”

In theory, banning sex offenders from being able to use social media sounds like a great idea, but in reality it does next to nothing to keep any of us safer. A ridiculously obvious way around the law is that sex offenders can just sign up for an account using a fake name—problem solved. Even if a sex offender did sign up for an account using their real name and picture, unless they get reported by another user, there is no way to tell.

No Way to Enforce 

With all the nation wide budget cuts to law enforcement, police officers certainly aren’t sitting around on Facebook scanning for sex offenders. Recently, a Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke advised residents “not to rely on 911.” What? Clearly counting on the courts to keep us safe is not the answer.

No matter how tech savvy our world becomes, it’s going to be old school safety measures that keep our loved ones protected from dangerous individuals. Common sense, due diligence, and making responsible choices will keep you safer than Facebook banning sex offenders, or states restricting their access to social media.

5 thoughts on “Does Banning Sex Offenders From Using Social Media Really Do Anything?

  1. Many people recall the tv show, To Catch A Predator. They point to this as proof that people target children online and that therefor registered sex offenders should not have access to social media. What they fail to realize is that LESS THAN one-tenth of one percent (fewer than one in a thousand) of the persons caught in this program had already been arrested and therefor were NOT on the sex offender registry! That makes this ban on social media virtually useless.

  2. If anything related to current sex offender laws made any difference what so ever, the actual rate of sex abuse would have changed. However, in the 10 years following the creation of the registry, the rate of sexual abuse hasn’t changed a single iota. However, as a nation, we are spending billions on creating, enforcing, and monitoring these laws and compliance with them.

    What have victims gotten for all of this money? Nothing. Not a darned thing. Victims are still in the same boat they’ve always been in. None of these laws are ever victim oriented. No victim benefits from these laws. When people claim they are for punishment for the “victims”, they don’t care at all about victims. If they did, they’d know that victims do not gain any actual benefit from these laws because all the money is being spent on enforcing laws that have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to NOT protect children at all.

  3. Aw, this was a really good post. Taking a few minutes and
    actual effort to generate a really good article… but what can I say… I hesitate a whole lot and never seem
    to get nearly anything done.

Comments are closed.